|
Post by flipthecoin on Mar 27, 2014 6:27:17 GMT -5
DaVinci was an incredible artist and innovator, but I'm sure even he wasn't able to predict that Photoshop would someday help reveal his true messages. As an artist myself, I can't think 500 years into the future and predict that people will finally have the technology to decipher my paintings. Let's not make him into something he wasn't and certainly never claimed to be.
What kind of artist would create symbols that nobody in his lifetime would be capable of figuring out? Artists like to communicate with their audiences and they like to make it into a game, but not an impossible one. What you created by overlaying the paintings is beautiful and interesting, but only coincidental due to the extreme attention to composition. Unlike snapshots, disciplined artists took great pride in composing each piece carefully given the space they had to work with. I could be wrong, but that's my .02.
|
|
|
Post by holygrail on Mar 27, 2014 6:45:24 GMT -5
My point is I didn't have to move anything around much. When mirrored against itself, everything shows symmetry and that symmetry will, according to the mindset of the individual will (or won't) represent something.
|
|
|
Post by jennyfromtheblock on Mar 27, 2014 13:57:48 GMT -5
If the images dont resonate with you in any way, I suppose just leave the rest of us crazies to dwell in our madness, lol.
Im not recommending anyone believe me, but find out for themselves. Clearly we have a mix of that here, but I dont think these should be dismissed completely
|
|
|
Post by worldmaster on Mar 27, 2014 14:07:54 GMT -5
I understand "resonating". The unaltered artwork actually "resonates" much stronger for me.
It's an innate human trait to try to create meaningful patterns where there are none and mirrored symmetry facilitates the process.
|
|
|
Post by assassincreed on Mar 27, 2014 14:21:23 GMT -5
If the art in some way shape or form changes your life than i guess that's enough of an argument to say that there is something more. We live in this holographic reality where intent and perception make up for 99.99999% of all matter.
|
|
|
Post by lastsupper on Mar 27, 2014 15:58:54 GMT -5
Alright, wtf, is the Madonna looking over a babys cradle or is that the Ark? Amazing dual images, I think you may be definitely on to something, The fact that the blend so well into new images is amazing in itself. The first duplicate image brought to mind Hinduism for me. Is it Shiva that has the many arms? Thanks for the outrageous postulation, can't wait to see some of the responses!
|
|
|
Post by platinumblonde on Mar 27, 2014 16:40:16 GMT -5
Alright, wtf, is the Madonna looking over a babys cradle or is that the Ark? Amazing dual images, I think you may be definitely on to something, The fact that the blend so well into new images is amazing in itself. The first duplicate image brought to mind Hinduism for me. Is it Shiva that has the many arms? Thanks for the outrageous postulation, can't wait to see some of the responses!
|
|
|
Post by supremegod on Mar 28, 2014 5:07:22 GMT -5
This is cool and all but how would do this with out computers? If he intended it to be cut in half and mirrored like that then how would you do that with out a computer and what clues did he leave for us to mirror his images like that? Do other painting witch are not his images come out the same way?
Maybe they come out like that because of the math he uses in his paintings?
I do find it odd that some of these entity's do look like the grays and they do resemble beings from another dimension(my own experiences). But that could just be the math he used. If you know any thing about sacred geometry then you can make the same geometric shapes these mirror images make. You should try this with 2 paintings. 1 where sacred geometry was used and the other with out it but both not Da Vinci.
These are all serious question and need to be answered before making your judgments. But it is pretty darn cool.
Keep in mind that history Chanel said he might have been spending time with ET's because they had no documentation on parts of his life.
|
|
|
Post by texasrangers on Mar 28, 2014 5:17:59 GMT -5
As soon as I saw it those same images stood right out to me. I starred ya, I posted the same thing and can't believe no one else is seeing it.....
|
|
|
Post by kat on Mar 28, 2014 5:56:39 GMT -5
Very interesting, these immediately remind me of *the* inter-dimensional messenger of them all, the Hindu God Vishnu, who represents the universe and all possible universes themselves. I would not be surprised if at some level, Leonardo da Vinci had secrets revealed to him that were not available to other people at the time.
Let me explain. Most psychologists these days seem to think that we learn based on what is already known around us. In other words, we are not capable of creating new thoughts. This is absolutely false, however, when we look at how our society has progressed - not stagnated - over the centuries.
What I am proposing is that this "imagination," the likes of which Da Vinci had a strong amount of, result from leaks from other dimensions (possible futures and realities) into our own minds. Whether he was simply an adept at this skill or had contact with real extra-dimensional entities, one thing is for sure, he knew more than he could have learned from his time.
Good, positive threads today people.
|
|