|
Post by bridezilla on Mar 28, 2014 12:19:46 GMT -5
There's around 20,000 government employees for ever 300,000 people and a large number of media, corporate and independent, some who give their lives for stories.
I just find it amazing they were all in on it. :)p
Don't you?
(If you are going to state the obvious, you dont have too. That was the intent of my sarcasm.)
|
|
|
Post by pimpsmackyou on Mar 28, 2014 16:15:29 GMT -5
Obviously, I will continue to ask if people know what was in Building 7 that needed to be destroyed, so earnestly.
|
|
|
Post by theconspiracist on Mar 29, 2014 4:27:17 GMT -5
If the obvious is a reasonable assumption that not everybody was in on it...than we agree.
I have already stated on a thread about Iraq war...and it's rather simple. The report about wmd's in Iraq were false. Whether intentional or not...it is off no consequence. The rest that were involved, could have just been innocently following orders.
Same here applies if you ask me. Very few people needed to be involved if any...
|
|
|
Post by theyarecoming on Mar 29, 2014 4:37:04 GMT -5
Blanket statements make us look likes fools. 5-10 maybe 20 strategically placed people, and you'd be amazed at what can be accomplished.
|
|
|
Post by BlackHawk on Mar 29, 2014 10:17:10 GMT -5
Obviously, I will continue to ask if people know what was in Building 7 that needed to be destroyed, so earnestly. Building 7 was full of CIA records - from the Clintons, Bin Laden, and the Bush's.
|
|
|
Post by spygirl on Mar 29, 2014 10:48:40 GMT -5
There are easier ways to make records disappear...than to take down a building.
|
|
|
Post by forcereconelite on Mar 29, 2014 11:05:45 GMT -5
No, she did not. Get your facts right. The BBC reporter said that she and her team was getting news that WTC7 had collapsed. This was about 20 minutes before it actually happened. She was NOT given "messages of an immanent collapse". She told the linkman at the BBC that the building had collapsed (NOT about to collapse) even though it was visible in the background. Errr you obviously haven't read my post properly.......try again! Now let's assume for argument sake it was an inside job...........please do tell why the government informed the media!!!! If you want anything kept secret the media is the last place to go! So enlighten me ...........why would the US government inform a humble BBC reporter about their plan???
|
|
|
Post by superxsoldier on Mar 29, 2014 11:21:32 GMT -5
Ahhh building seven. That mysterious feeling...that intuition...that gut feeling.
You can use the intellect to convince your eyes that they did not see, your ears that they did not hear...but deep down inside...you know the truth.
|
|
|
Post by flipthecoin on Mar 29, 2014 14:31:36 GMT -5
Building 7 was the ultimate goal - insurance monies handed out to the peoples that owned the other towers was just a "handout". and this is a perfect example of what is probably the biggest problem with the truth movement; its full of people shouting their mouths off like they know what they are talking about with out first engaging some gray matter. So the ultimate goal of 9/11 was the destruction of WTC-7 so you say? If that was the truth then why not just fly a plane into WTC-7 on its own and avoid all that complicated stuff with the twin towers, the pentagon and flight 93. Or better yet why not just have a huge fire start in WTC-7 claim it was some kind of accident then have all the fuel tanks blow up and claim that it was that which destroyed the building. You see, that's the problem with your claim, in fact that is the problem with most truther claims, a little logic and critical thinking destroys them.
|
|
psion
New Member
Posts: 15
|
Post by psion on Mar 29, 2014 14:39:03 GMT -5
And of course, in retaliation innocent people had to be bombed. After Afghanistan, why not bomb and invade Irak by claiming they had WMD's which of course were never found.
|
|