TheMarkFrost
Administrator
Uncovering The Inconvenient Truth
Posts: 241
|
Post by TheMarkFrost on Apr 9, 2015 17:56:14 GMT -5
Upsetting Scenes, Strong Language (Not Frequent)!
Segment 1: Eye Witness Accounts!
Many of the witnesses compare the collapse of the Towers with demolition jobs...
This is a recent video from September 2014... I did a search for this and didn't find anything that matched...
Many of the testimonies I hadn't heard before... Some will be known to you for sure...
Segment 2: News Footage!
This shows many different news scenes of both the South & North Towers collapsing, with different insights from different journalists... Many who make the claim that they look like demolition jobs.
Once again, some footage may seem familiar... Quite abit of it was new to me, even 13 years on.
Segment 3: Building 7!
The most suspect situation of that historical day... The Smoking Gun in many people eyes...
The building that the BBC said came down, a good 10 minutes before its actual "collapse"... The building that was "pulled" according to Larry Silverstein...
Segment 4: The Experts!
This section of the video is expert testimony on the hypothesis of demolition... Scientists, Firemen & others share their theories as to what may have occured on 9/11... Claiming it's impossible for fire alone to do such damage.
It's a touchy subject I guess...
I'm still on the fence in a way... But I do find it difficult to imagine 19 people bringing a whole country, the world's most powerful country, to its knees on that fateful day.
At the same time I don't find it hard to believe that such a large pair of buildings would collapse when weakened... Sort of like the exception(s) to the rule...
Fire hasn't collapsed buildings prior to or since 9/11... With that said not many 100+ story buildings have been on fire, nor damaged in such a way...
It's 57 minutes long and I've only managed the first 30 minutes so far, but it is hard hitting stuff...
|
|
|
Post by spion on Apr 9, 2015 18:11:08 GMT -5
Those towers were designed to take a plane hit. Two planes for three towers, Really good job there builders! Even managed to take down a building not hit, not fallen into by the first two..... magic!!
|
|
|
Post by ikillosama on Apr 9, 2015 18:33:33 GMT -5
Those towers were designed to take a plane hit. Two planes for three towers, Really good job there builders! Even managed to take down a building not hit, not fallen into by the first two..... magic!! Where was/is it written into the sales brochure for the towers that they will take a plane hit? Weren't they built with dirty mob money who hired the biggest cowboy architect ever knowing he'd use the cheapest and crappiest building materials available? Or is that just an urban myth?
|
|
TheMarkFrost
Administrator
Uncovering The Inconvenient Truth
Posts: 241
|
Post by TheMarkFrost on Apr 9, 2015 18:46:22 GMT -5
It'd explain why the concrete turned into dust... But I'm not so sure that that's true... I was under the impression that the Mob doesn't exist
|
|
|
Post by theyarecoming on Apr 9, 2015 19:05:03 GMT -5
Link Notice that these are the engineers that built and tested the towers strength for a range of threats, from weather to plane strikes..
|
|
|
Post by holygrail on Apr 9, 2015 19:15:01 GMT -5
No, no and thrice no.
It was a bunch of poorly trained Arab terrorists, expertly guiding the planes into the towers. Okay, it was the first case of steel structured building to collapse because of fire, but this was an unprecedented event.
Did you know that on the morning of 9/11 Rumsfeld was in a security meeting at the Pentagon trying to secure funding for further security measures against acts of terrorism, when the plane was expertly flown into it? Can you imagine how the conversation turned once the attack occurred?
Good ole Don raced to the scene, rolled up his sleeves and got on with aiding the injured.
|
|
|
Post by lucky4u on Apr 9, 2015 19:40:09 GMT -5
Not really a fan of sarcasm... Usually. But you did well my friend.
|
|
|
Post by holygrail on Apr 9, 2015 19:49:07 GMT -5
Not really a fan of sarcasm... Usually. But you did well my friend. Just anticipating a few replies that will come your way.
|
|
TheMarkFrost
Administrator
Uncovering The Inconvenient Truth
Posts: 241
|
Post by TheMarkFrost on Apr 9, 2015 20:07:07 GMT -5
No, no and thrice no. It was a bunch of poorly trained Arab terrorists, expertly guiding the planes into the towers. Okay, it was the first case of steel structured building to collapse because of fire, but this was an unprecedented event. Did you know that on the morning of 9/11 Rumsfeld was in a security meeting at the Pentagon trying to secure funding for further security measures against acts of terrorism, when the plane was expertly flown into it? Can you imagine how the conversation turned once the attack occurred? Good ole Don raced to the scene, rolled up his sleeves and got on with aiding the injured. Yes certainly... Let's see how it goes. I expect a bit of blowback...
|
|
|
Post by minuteman on Apr 11, 2015 9:48:58 GMT -5
Not really a fan of sarcasm... Usually. But you did well my friend. Just anticipating a few replies that will come your way. No, the usual cabal, will wait till the thread loses momentum and then bury all the supporting comments beneath a full page or 2 of comments that target posters credentials. The truthers already made the mistake of pointing out the holes in the original story. The official reports took years to come out because first the perps had to figure out what everyone saw and what accusations they were making, THEN come out with an OS that instead of making any sense, was simply designed to shut down any of the theories that had come up. "Let us not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories" Sound familiar?
|
|