|
Post by ikillosama on Mar 13, 2014 18:05:40 GMT -5
Awesome! I'm moving to Boston and buying a new camera. lol. (I'M JOKING!!!!! PLEASE DO NOT ATTACK! IT WAS A JOKE!) Pick me up first. I'll pay for the gas to get there and half the rent
|
|
|
Post by assassincreed on Mar 13, 2014 18:26:52 GMT -5
What is up a woman's skirt is not part of the public eye, nor should it be. We have every right to expect privacy of what is underneath our clothing is we are indeed wearing clothing. To look up a woman's skirt requires a deliberate and pointed invasion of her privacy, since going about one's normal business, what lies under her skirt would be hidden.
These perverts who make these films do so more often than not discreetly, while the woman is shopping, standing in line at the bank, waiting for a bus, and the camera is often on the perv's shoe. The woman is completely unaware of anything amiss, the perv is secretly invading her space.
So no, it is a totally different ballgame from being filmed scratching your butt or adjusting your underwear in a store.
|
|
|
Post by purplehazeleyes on Mar 13, 2014 19:40:32 GMT -5
The article seems to hang up on the fully clothed vs. partially nude or fully nude definitions for picture taking.
Question?
Isn't the positioning of the camera for "upskirting" deliberately creating a condition of partial nudity from a fully clothed person without their consent? If they are without underwear, it would seem to be even clearer for falling under (no pun intended) their definitions of expectation of privacy in partial or fully nude states of dress?
I don't mean to get all picky on terms...but they seem to be in reading the law the other direction. How isn't it valid to read this way? Odd interpretation.
|
|
|
Post by clueless on Mar 13, 2014 19:49:36 GMT -5
Here's one way to put a stop to the upskirters: KSDK NYC has a problem with people taking pictures of kids (not their own) and those pics are, from time to time, used for seedy photoshop projects. Since I've learned about this, I keep a keen eye out for it when I'm with my kids in parks and other areas where it happens. When I see it, I stand between my kids and the photographer, blocking their shot, and I start snapping pictures of the photographer. They tend to run with impressive speed when you do this.
|
|
|
Post by msapple on Mar 13, 2014 20:30:40 GMT -5
So just make sure you are wearing panties lol. I mean seriously, you go jungle you kinda want someone to see anyway right. That is like one of the many singers who got theirs photographed when they came out on stage without them. I mean really, everyone in the audience snapping pics, not their fault you forget you're drawers lol...
All the porn in the world available for free, who wants to run around taking pics up women dress for crying out loud.
You want to stop this and poporazi for that matter, start taking pictures of them and their families. It would stop real quick then lol.
|
|
|
Post by voltaire on Mar 13, 2014 20:36:46 GMT -5
A lack of morals in our society and legal system is what causes this to occur. Seems like the ones making the laws are a bunch of horney men there who feel that their kind have rights above those of most people Now, now, now don't you go ramming your morals down someone else's throat ... or up their skirt as the case may be. I knew there was a reason why I generally just don't wear skirts on general principle.
|
|
|
Post by bridezilla on Mar 13, 2014 21:02:06 GMT -5
Right up until the creeper/perv sues you or charges you for assault for kneeing him in the groin.
|
|
|
Post by sexykillergirl on Mar 13, 2014 21:13:47 GMT -5
I never wear a skirt anymore either. The only time I wore a skirt was when my sister and her friend talked me into wearing it and took a picture that never seems to get lost from our family photos. I learned about being immune to peer pressure when I was about four.
|
|
|
Post by platinumblonde on Mar 14, 2014 11:50:00 GMT -5
It never ceases to amaze me how the moral authorities always chime in on the weird pseudo-sexual topics advocating assault and murder over petty nonsense, and acting as if they are the epitome of ethics while doing such.
Cause you know... looking up someones skirt is totally less appropriate than assault/murder.
|
|
|
Post by maddog on Mar 14, 2014 12:19:00 GMT -5
Right up until the creeper/perv sues you or charges you for assault for kneeing him in the groin. Oh, I wasn't talking about me doing violence on the perv. my lady is completely able to take care of herself. I even bought her a Glock 40 for her birthday. I'm just a hopeless romantic I guess.
|
|