Post by missionximpossible on Mar 14, 2014 13:42:23 GMT -5
Um...
Ok. Now, correct me if I am wrong, but back aways in time, not too long ago that people under thirty do not recall it (I am twenty nine in a week or so, so I know whereof I speak), there was a time in which a woman wearing a skirt, had the precise same expectation of privacy while walking around on her daily business, as she did when in her own bath, behind closed doors. In fact, so did everyone else.
There was a time where people used to mind their own business, and expected others to mind theirs, and had every reason to expect that, because it is a matter of common decency, respect, and good manners not to go around videoing people without their permission. Are we really saying, in these modern times, that the deliberately invasive act, of placing a video camera in such a position as to create video of a ladies undergarments without their permission, is now ethically and legally unassailable?
When the hell did that happen? I consider it one of the foremost, the primary considerations of a man, to uphold the virtues, and whatever chastity may remain to members of the opposite sex, to protect them from danger, from assaults to their dignity and honour. Does the law now recognise the right of lecherous persons, to make videos of women without their permission, for the purpose of gratification of the videographer, or indeed their client (in the event of these videos being made to order, or as part of an internet business)?
There is a great deal wrong with Great Britain at the moment, but at least this sort of foolishness would simply not fly here. I would like to make clear, Massachusetts lawmen have simply got this wrong, and I hope to God they learn to get it right soon!
Ok. Now, correct me if I am wrong, but back aways in time, not too long ago that people under thirty do not recall it (I am twenty nine in a week or so, so I know whereof I speak), there was a time in which a woman wearing a skirt, had the precise same expectation of privacy while walking around on her daily business, as she did when in her own bath, behind closed doors. In fact, so did everyone else.
There was a time where people used to mind their own business, and expected others to mind theirs, and had every reason to expect that, because it is a matter of common decency, respect, and good manners not to go around videoing people without their permission. Are we really saying, in these modern times, that the deliberately invasive act, of placing a video camera in such a position as to create video of a ladies undergarments without their permission, is now ethically and legally unassailable?
When the hell did that happen? I consider it one of the foremost, the primary considerations of a man, to uphold the virtues, and whatever chastity may remain to members of the opposite sex, to protect them from danger, from assaults to their dignity and honour. Does the law now recognise the right of lecherous persons, to make videos of women without their permission, for the purpose of gratification of the videographer, or indeed their client (in the event of these videos being made to order, or as part of an internet business)?
There is a great deal wrong with Great Britain at the moment, but at least this sort of foolishness would simply not fly here. I would like to make clear, Massachusetts lawmen have simply got this wrong, and I hope to God they learn to get it right soon!
