|
Post by illuminati on Mar 29, 2014 16:34:43 GMT -5
Wikipedia is run by a monolithic cabal of intelligence agents in the UK, US, and Israel which acts as a block to control information presented to the public. While Wikipedia is notorious for its leftist bent, this is only part of a cover. In the Wikipedia guidelines for Notability (people): en.wikipedia.org..., porn actors are given precedence over painters. Moral concerns aside, this is a faulty hierarchical assessment--unless you have a design in place for social subversion.
During the traumatic, lengthy, soul-destroying AfD (Articles for Deletion) process, "Newbies" are tortured, lambasted, attacked, accused of "sock-puppetry" and bullied into giving up their attempt to create a new Wikipedia page for a given subject. The deeply disturbing behaviour exhibited by long-time Wikipedia editors is usually explained away as that of middle-aged British and American male fuddy-duddies and failed scholars seeking revenge against society for their not being recognised as the literary luminaries or genius software programmers that they think they are.
The truth, however, is much darker and perhaps even more painful: Wikipedia is run by intelligence agencies! MI5/6, CIA, and Mossad. Doubt it? Then ask yourself this question: Why wouldn't intelligence agencies have the most deeply vested interest in manipulating the world's primary source of intelligence: Wikipedia?
|
|
|
Post by assassinhitman on Mar 29, 2014 18:44:03 GMT -5
Only the english speaking version? Or in every language? Okay, I am just joking. I agree that the start is a very nerve-breaking case of rejection, rewriting and re-rejection until finally overcoming the flaws others found in your work.
But as I said, there are oh-I-don't-know 176 different versions of the wikipedia, each managed by a different team (usually, I don't know for every language). There aren't enough cabals on this planet to manage this for every version of wikipedia..
I think you are just de-illusioned about your work which was constantly denied and rewritten. True or not?
|
|
|
Post by zodiackiller13 on Mar 30, 2014 7:01:59 GMT -5
Wikepedia is main stream media There is no question it is controlled
|
|
|
Post by theconspiracist on Mar 30, 2014 7:07:10 GMT -5
English language Wikipedia is definitely what I'm talking about
Anyways, yeah you're right I'm frustrated to hell by their sinister bureaucracy control structure designed to kill all information they deem a risk.
|
|
|
Post by hardcoretruth on Mar 30, 2014 8:33:59 GMT -5
I believe your words are wholly in line with the truth.
|
|
|
Post by Olivia on Mar 30, 2014 8:47:00 GMT -5
I don't doubt it completely but there is more to it than that. It does serve some good purposes but when it comes to controversial subjects it becomes political and this is invertible considering how it is set up and managed. Even if it is, as you say controlled by the espionage agencies, which I don't refer to as intelligence, they would want to make it seem legitimate and let many people participate and get there way when it does oppose their interests. It provides an enormous opportunity for social research and psychologists are almo0st certainly doing that; the CIA has also been involved in that with the help of some presidents of the American Psychological Association so no doubt they're doing this. It also allows for political people to promote their views. If the management wanted to do a good job they could and would. I encountered this a few years ago and haven't kept up since. For my experiences, if your interested see Wikipedia Censorship
|
|
|
Post by ciathug on Mar 30, 2014 9:30:17 GMT -5
Why wouldn't intelligence agencies have the most deeply vested interest in manipulating the world's primary source of intelligence: Wikipedia? Wikipedia is just information. I would not say its the worlds primary source of information. Its not even an academic source.
|
|
|
Post by kat on Mar 30, 2014 10:24:06 GMT -5
Everything that has happened up to this very day is a conspiracy.
|
|
|
Post by maverick on Mar 30, 2014 11:04:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by maverick on Mar 30, 2014 11:08:00 GMT -5
Don't forget, the image shows Wikipedia's inept in covering up all of its atrocious activities shown in the image This shows that this was unilaterally done by Dennis Brown, who proves to be bad and atrocious like people on Wikipedia, such as BatteryIncluded. However, we do hope that Russavia (Scott Bibby) is still fine and is still fighting, and maybe contribute some of his information here, perhaps?
|
|