|
Post by msapple on Feb 17, 2014 6:18:37 GMT -5
i can't believe the 9/11 being blown up from the inside is true. there's so much out there to say otherwise.. in slowmotion
|
|
|
Post by msapple on Feb 17, 2014 6:23:09 GMT -5
People jump from World Trade Center
|
|
|
Post by kat on Feb 17, 2014 18:07:56 GMT -5
Mr. Badillo talked about "chemical signatures" that were indicative of explosives in the WTC. I haven't read a report that quantified such chemical signatures. I'd be very interested in reading such a report, if anyone has access to such a thing.
I didn't really hear anything particularly new from Mr. Badillo -- he is a new face, at least to me. Like many of you, I [still] have questions about many facets of the events of 9/11. Mr. Badillo said that he lost his uncle on that horrible day, and thus I believe that his heart and efforts are in the right place -- to find the truth. I'm a tad disappointed by this thread title. The photos are newly released, but I can't see that they prove much more than previous ones.
I'm dedicated to following the truth, with vetted evidence, regardless of where it leads. Just once, I'd like to see some "proof" of anything that truly held water.
|
|
|
Post by bond009 on Feb 17, 2014 18:13:39 GMT -5
If truthers pay legitimate experts for a new investigation, I don't really care. If you want to waste money on a new investigation, I really wouldn't care either because there is no evidence, old or new, but it would be a pretty good laugh seeing all the truthers just ignore another investigation, that they ordered.
There is no reason for an investigation because there is no evidence, simple as that
|
|
|
Post by Olivia on Feb 17, 2014 18:15:25 GMT -5
Very much appreciated. I'll review that link. I [once] had a degree in Chemistry, minor Physics & Math. It was a long time ago, that's why I say [once]. That's the kind of information I can really sink my teeth into.
thanks again
|
|
|
Post by voltaire on Feb 17, 2014 18:17:48 GMT -5
then you support a new investigation. that's good to hear! BTW? Have a good laugh? since when was investigating a tragedy funny?
wonder what kind of head is on your shoulders.
|
|
|
Post by theconspiracist on Feb 17, 2014 18:24:56 GMT -5
I just scanned over the report you linked. It's exactly the manner of information that I wanted to see. I'm very familiar with SEM, XRD, TEM and related analysis. I hadn't seen this before, and while it appears that the report plants seeds of their conclusion throughout, it also appears to have measurable and verifiable data.
I'm a tad troubled by the lack of chain-of-custody of the samples gathered, but will cross that later after delving deeper into the report. I'm no expert in spite of past education, and I'm not predetermined toward a conclusion.
Just wanted to thank you again.
|
|
|
Post by theconspiracist on Feb 17, 2014 18:25:55 GMT -5
then you support a new investigation. that's good to hear! BTW? Have a good laugh? since when was investigating a tragedy funny? wonder what kind of head is on your shoulders. It's funny when truthers just look at all of the previous investigations and basically go "No, this does not agree with my theory of how things happened." and then starting pulling things out of your glutteous maximus. As in they just put it through....no peer-review...you're understanding this, right?
|
|
|
Post by lucky4u on Feb 17, 2014 18:34:47 GMT -5
then you support a new investigation. that's good to hear! BTW? Have a good laugh? since when was investigating a tragedy funny? wonder what kind of head is on your shoulders. Amazing how cold-blooded these politically motivated 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY internet defense attorneys are. I think that it is blatantly obvious that the towers are exploding in these photos, hurling massive multi-ton chunks of steel in all directions, and pulverizing the contents of the towers in mid-air. This 9-11 WTC victim's family member would agree.
|
|
|
Post by msapple on Feb 17, 2014 18:38:50 GMT -5
when i saw this in person, i noticed the same thing, and still support that there were explosions, and not implosions. if there were implosions, the building should of folded in and onto itself, not hurl beams outwards.
It looked like everything disintegrated into nothing. there wasn't enough force downwards to cause that kind of damage without assistance of some kind of explosive device.
|
|