|
Post by monalisa on Feb 25, 2014 20:23:58 GMT -5
Actually he is a TROLL and a poor one at that. A debunker is someone who CAN PROVE a previous theory was FALSE, and none of the "debunkers" you mentioned have proved anything but utter ignorance and/or stupidity.
{Sarcasm} "Good thing" 90% of the american population does not care who commited the crime and for what reason or there would INDEED be a revolution within days.{/Sarcasm}
|
|
|
Post by Olivia on Feb 25, 2014 23:03:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by nsainvader on Feb 25, 2014 23:14:40 GMT -5
If you can explain how a tower with no impact can fall like the rest because of internal fire- something that has never before or since happened- then maybe you non-truthers might have some sort of case against the people who aren't afraid to say they think that any government might do something like this. Anybody with engineering or explosives education and training can you please tell me how tower 7 came down because of fire. I've been in a few taller hotels that had fires in them and never once were we evacuated for fear of collapse. I know this is a touchy subject, but if we can keep emotion out of it, maybe reason and rationale will let those 1000+ engineers, 1,000,000+ New Yorkers (THAT WERE THERE AND SAW IT, NOT JUST SPECULATING) and millions of "truthers" world-wide see that the real truth is it's not just the govs that are out to get us, but your average everyday citizen who feels like your view will upset his little world, and they will fight you to the death to remain ignorant. Or at least try to ruin your reputation and discredit anything you try to say.
|
|
|
Post by illuminati on Feb 25, 2014 23:25:40 GMT -5
You should check out this video. I have watched it several times, a physics laboratory did the research on the video the guy sent in. www.911eyewitness.com/It has a crap load of information and video angles, a very thorough job. It explains the debris being pushed upward and outward. The top of the building starts to tilt and fall away and then is miraculously "sucked" back into the straight downward fall? How? Vacuum created by the core of the building falling first? Definitely needs to be viewed.
|
|
|
Post by lucky4u on Feb 25, 2014 23:49:50 GMT -5
THAT is one of the greatest statements I have ever read!!!!!!! It is no laughing matter, but the fact that these "debunkers" will do ANYTHING to "keep" their ignorant place in society just cracks me up. And they WILL fight those of us who have experience in engineering, metallurgy and building construction and/or architecture to the death over it. How completely absurd of them. THAT is what I find so funny.
|
|
|
Post by Olivia on Feb 27, 2014 5:53:29 GMT -5
THAT is one of the greatest statements I have ever read!!!!!!! It is no laughing matter, but the fact that these "debunkers" will do ANYTHING to "keep" their ignorant place in society just cracks me up. And they WILL fight those of us who have experience in engineering, metallurgy and building construction and/or architecture to the death over it. How completely absurd of them. THAT is what I find so funny. Sorry, just correcting a mistake there, you seemed to have misspelled the word truthers as debunkers. Yes, I also find that funny, how completely absurd of them
|
|
|
Post by illuminati on Feb 27, 2014 6:24:07 GMT -5
I watched the hearings too (the ones not behind closed doors). All the "i can't remembers"..."can't recall"...lots of stalling, punches pulled, very contrived and controlled like a grade C trial film. Worst of all was how Bush put off any investigation until public opinion had the effect of creating the biased hearings we saw. Bush and Cheney were not subpeoned, of course not; and questioners were NOT allowed to tape their remarks, to take notes, or in any way record the responses to questions if they deigned to respond. Also, note: Bush and Cheney demanded they answer together..to get their story straight? Bush had a tendency to blurt out the 'wrong' things; Cheney there could watch dog this. No one questions the King. The questioning of Bush and Cheney was a travesty and demonstrated well the end of our republic and our democracy.
|
|
|
Post by msapple on Feb 27, 2014 6:55:45 GMT -5
See, right there, a perfect example of your fight to remain ignorant. It is so laughable that you would do that, just watch the documentary, you might actually learn something or better understand it. This guy was there, he lives in New York. He should have some idea of what really happened.
|
|
|
Post by wonderqueen on Feb 27, 2014 7:48:41 GMT -5
I'm remaining ignorant? He's lying / ignoring evidence, while proclaiming he's some god damn hero on the search for truth.
- He says the buildings didn't "collapse", they exploded mid-air - Says we have yet to be told what initiated the collapses - Thermite / paint chip argument - Says they came down at free-fall speed - Uses the stupid "A building has never been a building that collapsed from a plane hitting it, ever" line, which proves nothing. A building has never been hit by a fully fueled and loaded 747 either. With that logic, a 747 hitting a building being a first, as it never happened before, had to be faked. No planers, perhaps?
Does he even say he lives in NYC or was in NYC on 9/11? I could live next to a nuclear plant, it doesn't make me an expert on anything nuclear related.
|
|
|
Post by BlackHawk on Feb 27, 2014 8:51:28 GMT -5
Why couldn't there be explosives planted by extremists? Oh I forgot, Islamic terrorism doesn't really exist
|
|